Learn about
Measure 27
Frequently asked
questions
Concerns about genetically engineered foods
The Monsanto files
Make a donation
Who's endorsing
Measure 27?
Voter pamphlet
arguments
Links to other sites
Register to vote
Get involved
Home

 

People are talking

Why all GE foods
should be labeled

 



 



Voter pamphlet arguments

Sample of policies, petitions and “sign-on” letters calling for labeling and other responsible regulation of genetically engineered food and safe food in general. For more information, also see www.labelgefoods.org

American Association of Retired Persons (AARP):
“FDA currently allows these [genetically engineered] foods onto the market without prior safety testing and requires labeling only if the modified food contains a known allergen….
…Consumers have a right to know whether the foods they are consuming have been irradiated or genetically modified, and labels should be required to disclose this information” - The Policy Book: AARP Public Policies 2002, Consumer Protection, 12-65 & 67

FAIR PACKAGING AND LABELING ACT
TITLE 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE, CHAPTER 39 - FAIR PACKAGING AND LABELING PROGRAM

§1451. Congressional Declaration of Policy.
“Informed consumers are essential to the fair and efficient functioning of a free market economy. Packages and their labels should enable consumers to obtain accurate information as to the quantity of the contents and should facilitate value comparisons. Therefore, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress to assist consumers and manufacturers in reaching these goals in the marketing of consumer goods.”
[Note: Labeling required by Measure 27 would enable consumers to know whether the quantity of genetically engineered material in a given food product is more than one tenth of one percent of the weight of the product.]

U.S.A. PATRIOT Act
SEC. 1013.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
(9) Improvements must be made in assuring the safety of the food supply.
(12) Now is the time to strengthen our public health system and ensure that the United States is adequately prepared to respond to potential bioterrorist attacks, natural infectious disease outbreaks, and other challenges and potential threats to the public health.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the United States should make a substantial new
investment this year toward the following:
(7) Targeting activities to increase food safety at the Food and Drug Administration.

500,000 Signatures Delivered to Congress
In June, 1999, Mothers for Natural Law delivered 500,000 signatures, calling for mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food, to Congress and the Food and Drug Administration. Samples were also given the White House, Environment Protection Agency, and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in June 1999. www.safe-food.org

Statement of Solidarity with Southern African Nations Over GM Food and Crops (August 26, 2002)
http://www.gefoodalert.org/library/admin/uploadedfiles/
Statement_of_Solidarity_with_Southern_African_.htm

Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Signed by 477 scientists from 59 different countries, www.i-sis.org.uk/list.php

Farmers Declaration on Genetically Engineered Foods signed by 35 farm organizations calling for labeling and other responsible regulations, www.nffc.net/bio1.htm.

Genetically Engineered Food Alert Call to Action Signers – Includes over 260 organizations, VIP’s, and researchers and academics, political leaders and more. http://www.gefoodalert.org/pages/orgs.cfm April 2002

Response from all the African delegates (except South Africa), June 1998 – who objected that the image of the poor and hungry from their countries is “being used by giant multinational corporations to push a technology that is neither safe, environmentally friendly, nor economically beneficial to us.” http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/john.rose/africa.html