Learn about
Measure 27
Frequently asked
questions
Concerns about genetically engineered foods
The Monsanto files
Make a donation
Who's endorsing
Measure 27?
Voter pamphlet
arguments
Links to other sites
Register to vote
Get involved
Home

 

People are talking

Why all GE foods
should be labeled

 



 



Voter pamphlet arguments

Environmentally Responsible Investors urge Yes on 27

There are many documented risks connected with genetic engineering-- human health risks, environmental risks, cultural and community risks. There are also unknown risks due to the newness of the technology and the conflicting nature of the information that is available. As a result, it is essential that genetically engineered foods be labeled so that consumers can choose whether or not to purchase these modified foods.

Measure 27 provides much needed transparency. Note that Measure 27 does not prevent the sale of genetically engineered foods and crops—it simply requires that consumers be informed.

Increased Chances of Allergic Reactions. The transfer of genes from one organism to another, via genetic engineering, has tremendous implications for individuals with allergies who, without labeling, can inadvertently eat a food containing a gene to which they are allergic.

Risks to the Organic Industry: Organic farming, the processing of organic foods and products, and the sale of these products is a growing industry in Oregon. Genetically modified crops present numerous risks to the organic industry, including the risk that pests will become resistant to organic farmers’ methods and the risk of genetic pollution whereby genetically modified crops could contaminate organic crops.

Risks to Wildlife / Biodiversity and ecosystem integrity: Some genetically engineered crops have been shown to be lethal to certain organisms and thus represent a clear threat to biodiversity. Other genetically engineered crops have been found to release toxins into the soil.

Risks to the Developing World: There are significant concerns associated with companies engaged in genetic engineering, particularly in the way they deal with indigenous cultures and developing nations.

Support your right to know. Give consumers the ability to choose whether to support genetic engineering given the risks to human health, the local economy, the global environment, and the developing world.

Ralph Bloemers
Duke Castle
Sarah Cleveland
Tobey Fitch
Carsten Henningsen
Troy Horton
Jane Kolinsky
Shelly McFarland
Peter Samson
Dan Lerch-Walters